These Days Continue  
Go Back   These Days Continue > The Continuation > DMBc
Register Donate FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2016, 09:09 AM   #61
batleon
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MA by way of RI
Posts: 15,746
I guess it's too bad there is no Blue Water on this one, but that is nitpicking.

Also this Halloween is awesome

I'm going to take a stab and say the first couple of tracks on this are probably Dave solo too, right? At least Jane and BOWA?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack View Post
LET THE ALMANAC PICK SONGS / LIVE TRAX.
batleon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 09:19 AM   #62
priceofacoke910
The Curmudgeon
 
priceofacoke910's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Marion, VA
Posts: 4,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mersh View Post
Meh, that doesn't bother me. I mean, what should the cut off for LT/DMBLive be then? Nothing before 95 on LT and nothing after 94 on DMBLive? They have kept the real early stuff to DMBLive up to this point.
I'm pretty sure it has a lot to do with whether or not it is multi-tracked.
priceofacoke910 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 09:22 AM   #63
KerwinMcgee
Behind The Mask
 
KerwinMcgee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,927
I respect this pick but I have a really hard time listening to 1992 shows
__________________
I put my pants on just like the rest of you - one leg at a time. Except, once my pants are on, I make DMB latex masks.
KerwinMcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 09:23 AM   #64
blumathu
 
blumathu's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,443
Dude this is GREAT! I am definitely purchasing this one. A multi-track from '92, with Griesar, and Spotlight? Sign me up and keep the good picks coming.
blumathu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 09:41 AM   #65
Mersh
Moderator
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 52,488
Quote:
Originally Posted by priceofacoke910 View Post
I'm pretty sure it has a lot to do with whether or not it is multi-tracked.
I understand. I was talking about people saying old shows should only be DMBLive releases regardless.
Mersh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 10:06 AM   #66
cryfreedom09
 
cryfreedom09's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lawrenceville, Georgia
Posts: 1,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mersh View Post
I understand. I was talking about people saying old shows should only be DMBLive releases regardless.
I can't get behind this logic. Why wouldn't you want it to sound better?
cryfreedom09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 10:13 AM   #67
TheNoise
Mr. DMB, I don't feel so good.
 
TheNoise's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 22,574
TheNoise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 10:22 AM   #68
celluloid hero
 
celluloid hero's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 10,719
I have zero personal interest in this show itself. But what I am excited to hear is a multi-track recording. Part of the reason I hate 1992 DMB is Peter is so loud with the keys. But every show we have is mixed for the house. So instruments whose noise travels, like the horns and drums are turned way down in the mix and an instrument like Peter's that comes all through the soundboard will be louder. I really want to hear that band's instrumentation properly mixed. If Peter sits in the background of the mix, it's probably much truer to the way they actually sounded at Trax in 1992 than any recording that we've previously had. I think that's the most exciting thing about this release.
celluloid hero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 10:33 AM   #69
ThememanXX
 
ThememanXX's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 33,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by celluloid hero View Post
I have zero personal interest in this show itself. But what I am excited to hear is a multi-track recording. Part of the reason I hate 1992 DMB is Peter is so loud with the keys. But every show we have is mixed for the house. So instruments whose noise travels, like the horns and drums are turned way down in the mix and an instrument like Peter's that comes all through the soundboard will be louder. I really want to hear that band's instrumentation properly mixed. If Peter sits in the background of the mix, it's probably much truer to the way they actually sounded at Trax in 1992 than any recording that we've previously had. I think that's the most exciting thing about this release.
Need to copy/paste this into the first post. That's a fantastic point.
__________________
-Jason
Quote:
Originally Posted by FiddySpence View Post
handjob on the lawn during the encore saved it
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch View Post
Who'd you jerk off?
ThememanXX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 10:35 AM   #70
Mitch
Moderator
 
Mitch's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island
Posts: 14,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by celluloid hero View Post
I have zero personal interest in this show itself. But what I am excited to hear is a multi-track recording. Part of the reason I hate 1992 DMB is Peter is so loud with the keys. But every show we have is mixed for the house. So instruments whose noise travels, like the horns and drums are turned way down in the mix and an instrument like Peter's that comes all through the soundboard will be louder. I really want to hear that band's instrumentation properly mixed. If Peter sits in the background of the mix, it's probably much truer to the way they actually sounded at Trax in 1992 than any recording that we've previously had. I think that's the most exciting thing about this release.
yup
Mitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 11:39 AM   #71
batleon
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MA by way of RI
Posts: 15,746
Great point. The right mix is going to be critical for this. Reserving a pre-order until we get some clips.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack View Post
LET THE ALMANAC PICK SONGS / LIVE TRAX.
batleon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 11:52 AM   #72
roshea999
Now that's Oldstyle
 
roshea999's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 9,985
Wow just saw this. What a cool release
roshea999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 12:23 PM   #73
CRUSHsoccer15
 
CRUSHsoccer15's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, Texas From: Sittingbourne, England
Posts: 11,007
2002 and 2004 need some love.
__________________
John Dab
CRUSHsoccer15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 02:25 PM   #74
Josh.0
 
Josh.0's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Parts unknown
Posts: 14,544
I don't really love early DMB's sound. It wasn't as full as it was from about '96 - '04 and Dave's voice is always too nasally for me.

I won't be buying. I'll leave this one for the diehards of the early versions.

And Spotlight sucks.
__________________
tolerance
noun
US /ˈtɑː.lɚ.əns/ UK /ˈtɒl.ər.əns/
tolerance noun (ACCEPTANCE)
willingness to accept behavior and beliefs that are different from your own, although you might not agree with or approve of them.
Josh.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 02:36 PM   #75
celluloid hero
 
celluloid hero's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 10,719
Oh I hope there's a crowd mic as well so they don't sound like they're playing a free-form jazz exploration in front of a festival crowd.
celluloid hero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 02:51 PM   #76
Bluewater34
Is Old
 
Bluewater34's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 18,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by celluloid hero View Post
Oh I hope there's a crowd mic as well so they don't sound like they're playing a free-form jazz exploration in front of a festival crowd.



The more I think about it and see some of the points being made here, the more I think I may actually buy this after all. I may not listen to it more than a couple of times, but I want to encourage them to keep digging back, and I am curious what a multi-track from '92 sounds like.
__________________
Itís all a load of bullocks, and bullocks to it all.
Bluewater34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 03:01 PM   #77
greykitkat36
 
greykitkat36's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 11,717
The multitrack comments are so spot on. Board and house mixes aren't at all representative of the actual sound of the band they are based on how the sound guy mixed the room on that night, and like it has been said before, the instruments that are naturally louder are quieter on those recordings because there is less of a need to blend them. Multitrack means that every instruments level and tone can be adjusted and mixed to perfection--and what we will be getting is the BEST possible sounding show we've ever had from this era, and it's going to become one of the most revered releases, I'm telling you. Hearing the band durn g this fun experimental era is a treat and especially now with such a good quality tape coming out.
__________________
S'cuse me. (spits out Ricola) Its just so I know where it is, so I can get it after. Can't waste it, Ricola's delicious."-- DJM
greykitkat36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 07:19 PM   #78
The Godfather
Chartz
 
The Godfather's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 21,191
Spotlight
__________________
@Fixsweeny

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack View Post
So much dmb >
Anyone seen the dmb >
Too Much dmb
The Godfather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 07:20 PM   #79
The Godfather
Chartz
 
The Godfather's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 21,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by greykitkat36 View Post
The multitrack comments are so spot on. Board and house mixes aren't at all representative of the actual sound of the band they are based on how the sound guy mixed the room on that night, and like it has been said before, the instruments that are naturally louder are quieter on those recordings because there is less of a need to blend them. Multitrack means that every instruments level and tone can be adjusted and mixed to perfection--and what we will be getting is the BEST possible sounding show we've ever had from this era, and it's going to become one of the most revered releases, I'm telling you. Hearing the band durn g this fun experimental era is a treat and especially now with such a good quality tape coming out.
I concur.
__________________
@Fixsweeny

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack View Post
So much dmb >
Anyone seen the dmb >
Too Much dmb
The Godfather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 12:05 AM   #80
Poth Ead
Stay boring my friends...
 
Poth Ead's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by celluloid hero View Post
I have zero personal interest in this show itself. But what I am excited to hear is a multi-track recording. Part of the reason I hate 1992 DMB is Peter is so loud with the keys. But every show we have is mixed for the house. So instruments whose noise travels, like the horns and drums are turned way down in the mix and an instrument like Peter's that comes all through the soundboard will be louder. I really want to hear that band's instrumentation properly mixed. If Peter sits in the background of the mix, it's probably much truer to the way they actually sounded at Trax in 1992 than any recording that we've previously had. I think that's the most exciting thing about this release.
I was thinking about this as well. The fact we have a chance to hear their true sound in 1992 with a proper mix is, indeed, exciting
Poth Ead is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

These Days Continue > The Continuation > DMBc


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 thesedayscontinue.org

Page generated in 0.05109 seconds with 13 queries